Category Archives: Other

What Business Communities can learn from social networks & Consumer communities

Here are the top things I heard from a panel of Directors of B2B communities in our customer base. We hosted 5 Bay area companies with less than $20 Million in revenue and about a potential customer base (each) of 500 users.

I also recommend if you are in the SF Bay area to attend Community Next. Bill Johnston at Online Community Report pointed me to this. I have daddy duty this weekend so I cant go.

1. Get Started: Grass roots efforts win. Get a community started without “approvals”, “budget meetings”, “lengthly discussions on the impact to the brand”. “Its easier to ask for forgiveness than permission is true of 90% of large companies. The same is true for small companies”.

2. Keep it cheap for starters: If Digg and JotSpot could get started for less than $100,000 there is hope for others to not have to spend millions to get some form of community going before the big expenditures kick in.

3. Make it easy for customers (users, partners etc.) to sign up and contribute. All you should ask for is an email address (valid company address, not a free one) and password to join the community. Collect other profile metrics over time.

Types of Corporate Blogs and Categories of Communities

Brian Oberkirch
has a good entry on types of Corporate blogs. It is a good list which compares well to the categories of Communities.

Here are some other types of communities postings:

1. We are smarter than Me also has a good list of types of communities which they reference.
2. Nancy at Fullcirc has another list of multiple types of communities.
3. Finally Face2Interface has an list of 4 types of their communities.

Best practice: Blackberry communities; Pushing User Delight

There are several independent communities around Blackberry: Blackberry forums has about 16,000 users, PinStack has about 100,000 users. One is focused on the IT community supporting blackberry and another supporting the user community. Besides this Blackberry has their own developer community, Blackberry Connection and an Owners Lounge. Owners lounge has the fewest users – approximately 12,000 I am told* (not verified).

There are a total of approximately 4.2 Million blackberry users, worldwide and about 3+ million in US.
So less than 0.3% of users have signed up for their “communities”.  According to Travel Insider, 59% of users considered themselves satisfied and 7% dissatisfied.

So why such low numbers for community participation and if these are the numbers for a product that is so well liked and universally considered a HIT, what does it say about participation levels for your own company’s communities?

The one takeway: Supporting independent communities around your company’s products and services has justified ROI.

Here are some major findings about how to justify ROI for supporting independent communities:

1. No cost of community software, hardware, telecom, support personnel etc. – This cost is typically the highest when you are starting a new community. With independent communities this cost is borne by the community participants. Most of these communities are user funded or ad supported. Your company obtains great value with limited investment in supporting the community with oversight and direction.

2. Lower cost of supporting users: Every user that goes to pinstack for questions is NOT going to Blackberry site or calling their support – this is a huge cost savings.

3. Lower cost of research and trend identification: Independent communities tend to be more innovative around cost management, since they are driven by users. They are more likely to give you information about new trends, since there is a perception of being “objective” and “independent”. Instead of paying a consulting firm for focus groups and private communities, you can obtain the same level and possibly quality of information at much lower cost.

There are some downsides of course, but we will discuss that in a future post.

Quickly putting a best practice into action itself is a best practice

Giovanni Rodriguez at hubbub has a very good piece on “The Meming of Life”. Worth a quick read. He talks about 3 kinds of “best practice” ways that people are known to get ranked up in blogs. Posting comments on other blogs – Tailgaiting, Creating lists (like I have been guilty of) Aggregating and Baiting people to discussion. To net it out the one point that I could really relate to was “The experience led me to believe that we were entering an age of
disbelief that anyone can come up with anything that’s truly original.”

I do agree with his basic premise that doing something original is fulfilling in its own way. But, here are 2 questions:

1. In this age of instant copy and paste, how much value is there to original thought? I remember at Mercury we would come up with new positioning, demos, etc. each month only to see the same thing at competitors website within 4 weeks of our new message.

2. Is there anything necessarily wrong with seeing what works and repeating its success? The best companies in most industries (Microsoft for e.g.) are fast followers. Google itself did not invent search (only did it better) and nor did they come up with their business model – You have to thank Bill Gross of Idealab ( renamed Overture, sold to Yahoo) for that. There are also several studies that point to the fact that a good idea in one industry is worth taking to another and trying to do it better.

The one takeaway
: I think best practices yield results. If significant investment in taking an original idea and making it work is made for the benefit of one company, then the collective also-rans benefit and so does productivity. The key I believe is how quickly and fast does someone execute and make a best practice “even better”. Each best practice in the community world that are discussed is something you need to implement (even in a small way) to see how it betters your community. Afterall not everything that works for one community will work for another – even if it is in the same category, same industry with the same objective.

Software Vendors that provide Community Software

There are over 100+ software vendors providing products and applications to help companies. Here is a partial list by focus and type of community. The list is compiled based on the assumption that they provide more than just forums since Wikipedia has a large list of discussion board providers. This is primarily a list of Business community providers. We will focus on Social Networking providers later. A detailed analysis of capabilities, vision and direction on each is being compiled after detailed interviews with each of the companies.


Company Name



Communico Site Server




Convio (GetActive)




Jive Software




Leverage Software




Pix Pulse


Q2 Learning


Ramius Software


Red Dog Software


Small World Labs


Social Platform


Sparta Social Networks


Telligent Community






Wow BB




Connect Beam

Email is the new snail mail: Best practice for faster response in customer suppport communities

USA Today had a piece on the younger (18-30 demographic) spending more time with Instant messaging than with email.  “But when immediacy is a factor — as it often is
— most young people much prefer the telephone or instant messaging for
everything from casual to heart-to-heart conversations, according to
research from the Pew Internet & American Life Project. “And there is a very strong sense that the migration away from e-mail continues,” says Lee Rainie, the director at Pew. For many young people, it’s about choosing the best communication tool for the situation. You might use text messaging during a meeting
that requires quiet, Rainie says, or make a phone call to discuss
sensitive subjects so there’s no written record.”

An AOL survey also indicate something similar. “While adults and
seniors in 2005 showed more interest in IM, its gains on e-mail are
largely due the “teens and tweens” with spending power and trendsetting
tastes, according to survey data America Online released Thursday. For instance, the demographic has the highest percentage
(66%) of IM users to use it more than e-mail, America Online found.
That’s three times the percentage of other age groups.”

Matt at Jive Software also points to an informal report of IM usage inside Jive.  “It represents a staggering amount of email that we didn’t have to send,
as we’ve found that each IM conversation can represent several emails
(getting a question answered over email can take several messages back
and forth).”.

Kathy Sierra also talks about quick reponse to questions being a good reason communities thrive.

The one takeaway: If (like 45% of High tech and Telecom companies are) running a customer support oriented community OR if your primary demographic is Tweens and Teens Instant Messenger should be a crucial part of your enabling technology for quicker responses to help users communicate and get answers to their questions.

Increasing your Dominant vs. Subordinate participation in communities

I had an interesting conversation with a customer (who runs a technology user community). Most of his users in the community are lurkers as we know. In this case its closer to 99-0.95-0.05 (Only 0.05% of his users contribute).The one metric they wanted to have improve is the contribution % of his community to a representative 90-9-1. I cant say numbers but going from 0.05% to 1% would be HUGE for this community. We followed a 3 step approach towards understanding the community and ways to increase its participation.

The one takeaway
: Community incentive management (rewarding community members) is a motivating factor for increased participation.

1. Basic community site survey: Since my company does consulting in this area, we looked at usability, brand alignment, measurement metrics and demographic analysis. This 3 day effort gave us insights into the details around the 0.05 % of the people who contribute and why they were passionate enough to do so.

2. Detailed user forensics: This involved looking at users from the perspective of time (when they post), where they post from (work vs. home), access methods (WiFi vs LAN), Location (Which part of US), what threads they post on, community competition (what other sites vie for their communities attention) etc.

3. User surveys and interviews: Conducted over 2 weeks we had about 25 community members participate from a sample size we targetted of 150. Range of questions from what would get them to participate more, to what time is best for them to add tot he discussion.

There were a range of suggestions for improvement, but they key we found was most users did not feel they got anything out of participation. There will be about 10-15 members in your community that do it for “the greater good” and from the sense of giving something back. To get the next 20% increase in participation we highly recommend you manage a good incentive system for your community.